This website uses cookies primarily for visitor analytics. Certain pages will ask you to fill in contact details to receive additional information. On these pages you have the option of having the site log your details for future visits. Indicating you want the site to remember your details will place a cookie on your device. To view our full cookie policy, please click here. You can also view it at any time by going to our Contact Us page.

HSE rewrites Pipeline Integrity (PIPIN) model

13 June 2016

The UK Health and Safety Executive (HSE) asked the Health and Safety Laboratory (HSL) to rewrite its PIPIN (PIPeline INtegrity) model using a Monte Carlo solution approach, to update the science in the model based upon peer review recommendations, to update the damage data used in the predictive model, and to update the historical operational experience data. 

Stock image
Stock image

The effect of the revised model on the results generated from a set of 584 pipelines has been investigated and it was shown that the combined effect of all the modifications is to reduce the failure rates, on average, for all hole sizes compared to the original model.

HSE uses the PIPIN model to determine failure frequencies of major hazard pipelines. PIPIN calculates the failure rates for four categories of failure of pipelines (pinhole, small hole, large hole, and rupture). PIPIN uses two approaches to determine failure rates: an approach based on operational experience data, which generates failure rates for four principle failure modes (mechanical failures, ground movement and other events, corrosion, and third party activity); and a predictive model that uses structural reliability techniques to predict the failure frequency due to third party activity only. The predictive model uses historical data in the form of damage data distributions and strike rates as inputs to the fracture mechanics equations.


More information...

Print this page | E-mail this page

CSA Sira Test