This website uses cookies primarily for visitor analytics. Certain pages will ask you to fill in contact details to receive additional information. On these pages you have the option of having the site log your details for future visits. Indicating you want the site to remember your details will place a cookie on your device. To view our full cookie policy, please click here. You can also view it at any time by going to our Contact Us page.

Researchers in Canada find methane in groundwater poses safety risk

23 May 2017

Potentially explosive methane gas leaking from energy wells may travel extensively through groundwater and pose a safety risk, according to a new study by academics at the University of Guelph, Ontario. Researchers at the U of G-based G360 Institute for Groundwater Research found the gas travelled far beyond the shale wells where it is drilled to threaten explosion risk some distance away.

G360 researchers found methane gas could travel far in groundwater - Image Univ.of Guelph
G360 researchers found methane gas could travel far in groundwater - Image Univ.of Guelph

The findings were published recently in the journal Nature Geoscience.

Besides posing an explosion risk and degrading groundwater quality, methane can contribute to climate change when released to the atmosphere, said G360 director and principal investigator Beth Parker.

The researchers injected methane over 72 days into a shallow sand aquifer and monitored it for more than eight months at Canadian Forces Base Borden in Ontario. They found the gas travelled through the ground, was sometimes released into the atmosphere and dissolved extensively into the groundwater, where it changed water chemistry.

“If this water is extracted, say, by a farmer, the dissolved gas can be released and form an explosion risk or change the taste of the water,” Parker said.

“Depending on conditions of groundwater and aquifer minerals, microbes can ‘eat’ the methane and generate undesirable by-products such as hydrogen sulphide, and induce the release of trace metals into the water.”

The study found only small changes in water quality, said lead author Aaron Cahill, a former U of G post-doctoral researcher. He said the study covered only a short time period and used only small amounts of methane.

“For larger leaks over longer times and greater areas, these findings would indicate that the groundwater would become unusable,” he said.

Leaky wells could pose a significant danger to the environment in a number of ways, said Cahill, who is now at the University of British Columbia.

“Methane is 30 times more potent than carbon dioxide at trapping heat when in the atmosphere, so we need to consider both the air and the groundwater when monitoring for leaks. The impact to groundwater is likely to be long-term and persist long after a methane leak is fixed,” he said.

Sealing energy wells thoroughly can be extremely challenging, said School of Engineering adjunct professor John Cherry, co-author of the study.

Energy wells run deep underground through many layers of rock and sediment, he said.
“When energy wells are constructed, the cement used might not seal fully, or will initially seal but as it matures little cracks can form, allowing gas to escape. While drilling is better than ever before, leaky wells are still common and represent a large liability for the oil and gas industry,” Cherry said.

Monitoring of groundwater for methane leaks is rarely done. That needs to change, he said.
“The industry needs a level playing field where the rules and reasonable expectations are clear. The gas will spread up and out in groundwater, so it is the responsibility of government to set science-based groundwater monitoring standards for all companies to meet.”

Print this page | E-mail this page