This website uses cookies primarily for visitor analytics. Certain pages will ask you to fill in contact details to receive additional information. On these pages you have the option of having the site log your details for future visits. Indicating you want the site to remember your details will place a cookie on your device. To view our full cookie policy, please click here. You can also view it at any time by going to our Contact Us page.

Baseefa Ltd

US judge caps BP Gulf of Mexico spill fine under Clean Water Act

16 January 2015

BP will face a maximum fine of $13.7 billion under the Clean Water Act for its Gulf of Mexico oil spill, several billion dollars less than feared, after the case judge ruled that it was smaller than the US government claimed. Federal magistrate Carl Barbier put the size of the worst offshore spill in US history in 2010 at 3.19 million barrels.

Deepwater Horizon (Image: Ideum)
Deepwater Horizon (Image: Ideum)

This is well below the government's estimate of 4.09 million barrels, which could have led to penalties of up to $17.6 billion.

BP's stock rose 2.4% in London on December 16 following the announcement as investors digested the first positive news after years of mounting fines in continuing legal battles since the Deepwater Horizon blowout and spill in April 2010.

Under a "gross negligence" ruling Barbier issued in September, BP could be fined a statutory limit of up to $4,300 for each barrel spilled, though he has authority to assign lower penalties. A simple "negligence" ruling, which BP sought, caps the maximum fine at $1,100 per barrel.

The Clean Water Act penalties would come on top of more than $42 billion the oil major has set aside or spent for clean-up, compensation and fines. About 810,000 barrels were collected during the clean-up.

In his ruling on December 15, Barbier said BP's response to the disaster was not grossly negligent, but stuck to his earlier opinion that it had been grossly negligent leading up to the Macondo well blowout.

Penalties will be assigned after the third and final phase of the company's non-jury trial, with BP lawyers expected to argue for a small fine per barrel.

"BP believes that considering all the statutory penalty factors together weighs in favour of a penalty at the lower end of the statutory range," a BP spokesman said.

The first two phases of the trial, over the degree of negligence and the size of the spill, have concluded.

Even after the Clean Water Act fines are set, BP may face other bills from a lengthy Natural Resources Damage Assessment -- which could require BP to carry out or fund environmental restoration work in the Gulf -- as well as other claims.


Print this page | E-mail this page

CSA Sira Test